Stories on
wait
CNET.co.uk has 149 stories on wait
Samsung LE32R41BD review
Reviews Standard connectivity could be more plentiful, but if you've been putting off buying an LCD TV until they become affordable, your wait is over. This TV's price, typically a mere £950, was unthinkable at the beginning of 2005, making it hugely...
Editor's rating
8
Tags: samsung, contrast, high definition, xbox
31 October 2005, 16:32
HP Photosmart M437 review
Reviews You can expect a lag of over a second when shooting in bright light, and a wait of up to 2 seconds when shooting in low light. After you take the shot, you'll have to endure another wait of 2 seconds before you can shoot again.
Editor's rating
6
Tags: hp, cameras, budget, fix
9 July 2007, 11:39
Olympus FE-170 review
Reviews With the onboard flash enabled, that wait becomes an even-longer 5.5 seconds. The camera takes 5.7 seconds from power-on to first shot, and every shot thereafter suffers a wait of 4.8 seconds without flash.
Editor's rating
5.6
Tags: olympus, iso, automated, balance
18 October 2006, 12:40
Apple iMac Core Duo (20-inch, 2.0GHz) review
Reviews Then there's no reason to wait. But if you want to run Photoshop or a non-native video-encoding program such as Sorenson Squeeze, we highly recommend you wait until the software catches up before purchasing a new iMac Core Duo.
Editor's rating
7
Tags: apple, binary, boost, universal
24 March 2006, 9:16
Olympus FE-240 review
Reviews That painful wait increased to 5.7 seconds with the onboard flash enabled. While 5 seconds is indeed far too long to wait between shots, it's not too surprising -- the previous-generation FE-200 had shot-to-shot times of more than 7 seconds.
Editor's rating
6.6
Tags: olympus, automated, noise, balance
12 March 2007, 13:52
Kodak EasyShare V803 review
Reviews With the onboard flash enabled, that wait increased to 3 seconds. After a 4.3-second wait from power-on to first shot, we managed to take new photos every 1.4 seconds thereafter. We don't say this enough, but when it comes to gadgets, substance...
Editor's rating
5.8
Tags: kodak, canon, megapixel, shot
26 March 2007, 16:44
Canon PowerShot A720 IS review
Reviews With the flash turned on, that wait balloons to 4.3 seconds. After a scant 1.4-second wait from power-on to capturing its first shot, the camera could take a new photo every 1.8 seconds thereafter with the onboard flash disabled.
Editor's rating
7.8
Tags: canon, processor, contrast, shots
7 November 2007, 11:56
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W90 review
Reviews After a 1.7-second wait from power-on to first shot, the W90 could capture a new picture every 1.3 seconds with the onboard flash disabled. With the flash turned on, that wait more than doubled to 3 seconds.
Editor's rating
7.4
Tags: sony, contrast, budget, shoot
27 February 2008, 9:52
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W130 review
Reviews After a 1.8-second wait from power-on to first shot, the camera could capture a new picture once every 1.4 seconds with the onboard flash turned off. With the flash enabled, however, that wait doubled to 2.8 seconds.
Editor's rating
7.4
Tags: sony, contrast, noise, colours
29 February 2008, 10:39
Canon PowerShot A590 IS review
Reviews With the flash turned on, that wait more than doubled to an anguishing 5.2 seconds. After a 1.8-second wait from power-on to first shot, the camera could capture a new picture once every 2.3 seconds with the flash disabled.
Editor's rating
7.8
Tags: canon, shooter, shoot, contrast
14 March 2008, 11:00
Olympus FE-180 review
Reviews With only a 1.7-second wait between power-on and first shot and a 1.6-second wait between shots thereafter, you can snap photos at a relatively rapid clip. With the onboard flash enabled, the wait increases to a modest 3.8 seconds.
Editor's rating
6.8
Tags: olympus, scene, body, balance
26 October 2006, 13:08
Nikon Coolpix L11 review
Reviews That wait increased to 4.6 seconds with the onboard flash turned on. After only a 1.8-second wait from pressing the power button to taking the first shot, the camera could snap off a new photo every 2.2 seconds with the flash turned off.
Editor's rating
6.4
Tags: nikon, eye, shoot, budget
7 August 2007, 15:51
Samsung L830 review
Reviews At ISO 400 and above, that wait increased to 4.5 seconds. If you like to shoot in high-speed and high-sensitivity modes, though, you can expect a much longer wait between shots. For a sub-£150 camera, Samsung's 8-megapixel L830 packs some strange...
Editor's rating
6.4
Tags: samsung, shoot, pixels, shots
4 January 2008, 13:27
Olympus u [mju:] 730 review
Reviews With the onboard flash enabled, that wait increased to 3.5 seconds. After waiting 2.5 seconds from powering it on to taking the first shot, we had to wait an additional 2.9 seconds between every shot after that.
Editor's rating
6.2
Tags: olympus, shoot, body, shot
6 December 2006, 10:00
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W120 review
Reviews With the flash turned on, that wait more than doubled to 2.7 seconds.The shutter felt quick, lagging just a hair longer than the W130 with our high-contrast target. After a 1.8-second wait from power-on to capturing its first JPEG, the camera could...
Editor's rating
7.4
Tags: sony, budget, optical, shooter
17 March 2008, 16:16

- Photos: We project a riot with Epson's DM2, TW420 and TW5000
- Photos: Hands-on with new TVs from Sony
- Toshiba Regza 40ZF575D: Improving bog-standard video
- Photos: Sony E-series Walkman cheers up IFA
- Hands-on with the Philips MCM770 hi-fi: Baby of the bunch
- Photos: Sony launches new S-series Walkman at IFA

Format wars: The tech that should have won
Did you love Laserdisc? Were you bonkers over Betamax? Travel back in time with Captain Tech and check out the format losers that should have triumphed

Test your broadband speed
Thinking about changing your broadband Internet provider? Run our quick and simple test to find out how your connection measures up
















![Olympus u [mju:] 730](http://www.cnet.co.uk/i/c/rv/sc/31965099/31965099-2-60-camera+on-1.jpg)

