Apple Mac mini (2009 edition)

Print | Close this window

http://reviews.cnet.co.uk/desktops/0,39029981,49301373,00.htm

What you need to know

We like:

Competitive Nvidia graphics chip; includes updated Apple iLife '09 suite; energy-efficient; space-saving chassis retains distinct design

We don't like:

Similarly priced PCs offer greater functionality

CNET.co.uk judgement:

While we're still impressed that the Apple Mac mini packs so much into a small package, some rival PCs offer more features for less money. If saving space and using Mac OS are important factors for you, the new Mac minis will appeal, but your money will go further with a budget Windows desktop

Score:

7.3 Very good

Full Review

Reviewed 6 March 2009

Reviewed by Justin Yu

Apple has breathed fresh air into its line of Mac minis, whose specs haven't changed since an update in August 2007. The company has added significantly improved Nvidia graphics, a new 2GHz Intel Core 2 Duo processor and a larger hard drive. Those changes are welcome, and we're also impressed by the mini's power efficiency, as well as its ability to handle multiple programs at once.

But we still take issue with the overall value of the mini, which is available now for around £500. The mini remains a distinctive-looking computer and has more than a few useful features. We can easily imagine it in a light-duty work role. But, if your goal for a lower-cost desktop is hardware bang for your buck, you're better off with a more well-rounded Windows system.

Design
In terms of design, there's not much here for fans of the previous minis to get excited about. The case is made of the same aluminum housing and white plastic top, and the only minor differences in the rear panel are an additional USB port (bumping the total up to five), a single FireWire 800 port, a Mini-DVI input and a Mini DisplayPort input. That display-standard change is significant because it lets the mini support two displays for the first time, and the internal hardware is also powerful enough to drive a 30-inch, 2,560x1,600-pixel LCD.

At the moment, Apple's 24-inch LED Cinema Display is the only monitor that will connect to a Mini DisplayPort input without an adaptor. A Mini-DVI to single-link DVI adaptor comes in the box, and Apple sells a variety of other adaptors for both inputs.

For £500, the basic mini reviewed here gives you a 2GHz Intel Core 2 Duo processor with an integrated Nvidia GeForce 9400M graphics chip, 1GB of DDR3 RAM, a puny 120GB hard drive running at 5,400rpm, a dual-layer DVD burner, and built-in 802.11n wireless networking. You need to add a monitor, a keyboard and a mouse to get a complete set-up.

In comparison, the Acer Aspire X1700 slimline PC cuts the price down to £450 for a faster processor speed, three times more RAM and a staggering 520 added gigabytes of storage space -- at 7,200rpm, to boot. The Acer lacks the mini's good looks and wireless networking, but its hardware becomes even larger when you consider expansion possibilities, both inside and out.


The main cosmetic changes to the mini have been made on the rear

Thanks to its accessible case interior, the Acer system provides room for a dedicated half-height graphics card, along with a spare full-sized hard-drive bay and a PCI Express slot.

On the outside, its prospects improve even more. Its HDMI video output is more living room-friendly than the mini's Mini DisplayPort out, and it also needs no special adaptor to connect to a television. Its eSATA input also offers nearly four times the data bandwidth and twice the transfer speed of the mini's FireWire 800 jack. Those features all give the less expensive X1700 more flexibility as either an office or a living-room PC, with the potential to add more features later. In comparison, Apple's traditional closed-box system looks decidedly rigid.

Although we question the mini's hardware value, Apple helps matters by including its iLife '09 application suite. We're also glad to see the Mini-DVI to single DVI dongle mentioned above, but, as usual with the mini, there's no mouse or keyboard. We're also disappointed that Apple left off the tiny Apple Remote this time around. You can add an Apple keyboard and mouse set for £62, and the Remote for an extra £15. Other options include a faster 2.26GHz CPU for an extra £120, and more RAM and larger hard drives, both for reasonable prices.

Performance
We have mixed feelings about the mini's benchmark performance. On the one hand, it came in behind the X1700 on three of our four application tests. That's hard to forgive, considering the mini's higher price tag.

The mini performs better in terms of multitasking, however. We suspect OS X continues to provide Macs with an advantage by requiring fewer system resources than Windows Vista. We imagine most people will use low-cost desktops for basic word processing, Web surfing and emailing, rather than ripping through large-batch media-file conversions, so, although we wish the mini's performance was more balanced, if we had to pick one area for it to excel in, multitasking would seem most appropriate.

The mini's gaming performance is also to its credit, considering the older model's near-total inability to render a 3D image. Thanks in large part to the new Nvidia graphics chip, we were able to run Quake 4 at a 1,600x900-pixel resolution at decent image quality with minimal lag. Our gaming experience wasn't entirely seamless and more recent games will surely provide a larger challenge, but, as a budget gaming system, the mini is at least respectable.

While we might have some doubts about the mini's performance, its power efficiency is highly encouraging. We hooked both the X1700 and the mini to a power meter and tested both systems' consumption at idle with a few basic apps open, and under load while playing Quake 4.

Happily, our results fell in line with Apple's claims. When the system is powered on but idle, the mini used only 15.4W, compared to the X1700's 70.9W. The mini also saved a relatively large amount of energy under load, consuming only 28.3W during our Quake 4 session, as opposed to the X1700's 95.6W. We're still refining our power-consumption testing, and we have some concerns about accuracy at low wattages, but, with such a large gap, we feel comfortable in saying that, compared with other low-cost systems, we expect you'll save money on your electricity bill with the mini.

Adobe Photoshop CS3 image-processing test (in seconds)
(Shorter bars indicate better performance)
Dell Inspiron I530-120B
115 
Acer Aspire X1700-U3700A
149 
Apple Mac mini (2GHz, 320GB)
165 
Apple Mac mini (2GHz, 120GB)
168 
Gateway DX4200-09
203 

Apple iTunes encoding test (in seconds)
(Shorter bars indicate better performance)
Dell Inspiron I530-120B
137 
Acer Aspire X1700-U3700A
175 
Apple Mac mini (2GHz, 120GB)
198 
Apple Mac mini (2GHz, 320GB)
201 
Gateway DX4200-09
244 

Multimedia multitasking (in seconds)
(Shorter bars indicate better performance)
Apple Mac mini (2GHz, 320GB)
501 
Apple Mac mini (2GHz, 120GB)
593 
Dell Inspiron I530-120B
713 
Gateway DX4200-09
874 
Acer Aspire X1700-U3700A
904 

Cinebench
(Longer bars indicate better performance)
Rendering Multiple CPUs  
Rendering Single CPU  
Dell Inspiron I530-120B
6501 
3382 
Gateway DX4200-09
5819 
1627 
Acer Aspire X1700-U3700A
4796 
2575 
Apple Mac mini (2GHz, 120GB)
4365 
2224 
Apple Mac mini (2GHz, 320GB)
4352 
2305 

Power consumption (W)
(Shorter bars indicate better performance)
Load  
Idle  
Apple Mac mini (2GHz, 120GB)
28.3 
15.4 
Acer Aspire X1700-U3700A
95.6 
70.9 

Conclusion
The new Apple Mac mini retains its distinctive appearance, cramming plenty of features into its space-saving chassis. While the multitasking performance of this impressively energy-efficient machine is good, similarly priced PC rivals offer better overall performance and greater flexibility.

Additional editing by Charles Kloet

Visit reviews.cnet.co.uk for in-depth reviews of many more products