Sony Alpha DSLR-A200

Print | Close this window

http://reviews.cnet.co.uk/digitalcameras/0,39030233,49296003,00.htm

Reviewed 18 March 2008

Reviewed by Lori Grunin

Sony's entry-level dSLR, the Alpha DSLR-A200, delivers a just-the-facts-ma'am shooting experience. For the most part, it provides the average design, basic feature set, modest performance and better-than-snapshot photo quality that typifies this market segment, and it's available for around £520.

Design
The 10.2-megapixel A200 comes with a standard DT 18-70mm f3.5-5.6 lens, which we tested. For other inexpensive alternatives you'll have to turn to compatible A-mount Konica Minolta, Sigma or Tamron offerings.

At 532g, the A200 weighs more than most of its competitors, despite its plastic-clad body. It feels solid, though, and the rubberised grip has a deep indent for your finger that makes the camera comfortable to hold. If you plan to connect the camera directly to your computer rather than use a card reader -- which we don't recommend -- then avoid the A200.

The A200 uses a simple, uncluttered control layout

For one, the USB connector is located inside the CF card compartment, which means you have to leave the door open while downloading, potentially allowing all sorts of schmutz to get on to the card-slot contacts, or providing a protrusion to hit and hurl the camera to the floor, if you're accident prone. More importantly, Sony uses a proprietary combo USB/AV connector on all its dSLRs, for no reason that we can see other than to force you to buy a cable from them if you lose the bundled one. Annoying.

Operating the A200 is straightforward. There are direct-access controls for ISO sensitivity, exposure compensation and drive/bracketing/self-timer modes, while flash, AF, white balance, AF area and D-RangeOptimiser settings are grouped under a screen pulled up by the Fn button. Unfortunately, unlike the previous DSLR-A700 model, you can't change setting options directly via the information display.

Features
The A200 supports wireless flash, uncommon but not unique in this price class, and we actually like the bare-bones implementation. Rather than grafting pro multichannel support on the camera, which can be quite confusing to configure, it's basically binary: on or off.

You can't change settings directly via the information display -- you have to pull up this screen via the Fn button

The other features -- and their implementations -- are pretty typical for the camera's class, including sensor-shift image stabilisation and a 69mm (2.7-inch) LCD. Like most, but not all, of the cameras in this class, the A200 lacks live view shooting.

Performance
Our tests indicate it wakes up and shoots very quickly -- in roughly half a second. Under good, high-contrast lighting, it focuses and shoots in just under a third of a second, rising to a moderate 1.2 seconds in dimmer conditions. Typically, it captures consecutive frames in 0.6 seconds, jumping up to 1.3 seconds with the built-in flash enabled.

Its 2.8 frames-per-second continuous shooting speed falls around the class average. Also as is typical for this segment, it has limited non-JPEG burst shooting capabilities: only 3 frames raw+JPEG or 6 frames raw in burst mode. In casual testing, the image stabilisation system delivered about 3 stops of latitude over what the reciprocal rule dictates --1/10 second versus 1/70 second for a 70mm focal length -- which is pretty standard.

Shooting speed
(Seconds -- smaller is better)

Time to first shot

Raw shot-to-shot time

Shutter lag (dim light)

Shutter lag (typical)

Sony Alpha DSLR-A200

0.5

0.6

1.2

0.3

Nikon D40x

0.2

0.8

0.9

0.4

Olympus E-510

1.3

0.8

1.3

0.4

Pentax K100D

1.2

0.5

1.3

0.4

We do have a few performance gripes, though. For one, the LCD is very difficult to view in direct sunlight. Secondly, the focus indicators for the 9 off-centre focus points are lines -- rather than squares -- and very dim. Some people may have trouble seeing them. Plus, the shutter, or at least the mirror flip it drives, sounds unusually loud.

Image quality
On the whole, the A200's photos looked okay, if unexceptional. It renders reasonable, if somewhat warm or cool automatic white balance, depending upon the lighting. In standard mode, exposures seem skewed too much toward the midtones -- probably to avoid blown-out highlights -- so images look low contrast.

Its noise profile looks good until ISO 800, at which point colour artefacts become obvious, but that's par for the course on low-end dSLRs. The kit lens we tested produced soft photos.

Conclusion
Sadly for the A200, there are better, more interesting models from earlier years whose prices are dropping into its territory -- the Nikon D40x or Canon EOS 400D if you're willing to forgo the image stabilisation, or the slightly more expensive Pentax K10D if you're not. You can even opt for the similar and two-year-old Alpha DSLR-A100, if you don't shoot a lot at high ISO settings, and put the money you save towards a better lens.

Additional editing by Shannon Doubleday