Compact and lightweight; fast and responsive; intelligently designed with shooting-friendly layout
Second status LCD has been eliminated; slow kit lens; no spot metering; poor exposure of backlit subjects
The Canon EOS 400D remains a very good first dSLR, but ultimately a disappointing followup to the 350D, which cedes its lead to the Nikon D80
7.8 Very good
Reviewed by Lori Grunin
What's true for doctors applies equally to consumer electronics manufacturers: first, do no harm. Canon is usually good at adhering to that maxim, making only minor changes to successful products and saving the daring moves for the models that need it.
Changing sensors isn't normally considered terribly daring when it comes to digital cameras. But as the EOS 400D's predecessor -- the EOS 350D -- is renowned for producing excellent, low-noise photos at a more-than-adequate 8-megapixel resolution, it seems risky to replace it with a higher-resolution but potentially lower-sensitivity chip as Canon has done with the new model. Perhaps the Nikon D80 raised the stakes. Perhaps Canon felt it was an inevitable necessity. Whatever the reason, it yields mixed results.
Design
Sticking with similar sensor dimensions allowed Canon to keep the same moderately compact design for the EOS 400D, though it weighs 25g more than its 485g predecessor. With the small, exceptionally light kit lens, the camera felt well balanced. Attached to the substantially larger and heavier 16mm-to-35mm (25.6mm-to-56mm equivalent) lens or the Speedlite 580EX flash, however, the 400D does feel slightly lopsided.
Although much of the design remains the same as the 350D's -- it comes in either black or metallic-silver plastic -- there are a couple of key changes. The LCD display has grown from 46mm (1.8 inches) to 64mm (2.5 inches), essentially squeezing the status/info LCD into the ether. On the one hand, using the main LCD allows for an exceptionally readable, in-your-face method of monitoring the settings. The paper-white background gets distracting, however, and the automatic sensor -- which blanks it when you put your eye to the viewfinder -- makes it even more so. You can turn it off altogether, but the info in the viewfinder doesn't include ISO speed, white balance, battery level and other useful settings that generally display on a status LCD.
In most other respects, the control layout on the 400D mimics that of the 350D, which is pretty much how it's been on Canon dSLRs since the beginning. That's a consistency we can appreciate. The 400D can also accept all the same accessories as the 350D.
Features
For better -- or sometimes worse -- the feature set of the Canon EOS 400D remains roughly the same as the 350D's. The kit version comes with the f/3.5-to-f/5.6, 18mm-to-55mm EF-S lens (29mm-to-88mm equivalent, thanks to the 400D's 1.6x conversion factor), which is a trifle too slow for frequent indoor users.
Most amateurs will find all the essentials -- a handful of manual, semi-manual and automatic exposure modes, user-selectable nine-point autofocus and AI Servo autofocus for moving subjects and simultaneous raw-plus-JPEG capture.
To keep up with the camera Joneses, the CMOS chip in the 400D is now self-cleaning. As with many other dSLRs, the low-pass filter layer vibrates when the camera powers on and off in order to shake dust away from the sensor. There's also an anti-static coating on the filter to repel dust. Furthermore, a piece of adhesive surrounding the sensor is designed to grab dust, keeping it from flying around inside the camera chassis. In addition to dust control, Canon has split the low-pass filter into two parts, effectively placing whatever dust does settle beyond the range of focus.
Unfortunately, like the 350D, the 400D lacks a spot meter -- it supplies only evaluative, centre-weighted average and partial centre-weighted metering. There is simply no substitute for a spot in tricky lighting situations. In fact, we couldn't avoid severe underexposures of a backlit subject with the available metering tools, which is inexcusable for a camera of this class.
Performance
Though the CMOS imager used by the 400D is the same physical size as the version in the 350D, Canon has crammed more pixels into the space to bump up the resolution, and has improved the design of the microlenses that sit atop each photosite -- the microlenses gather indirect light and focus it back on the sensor -- as well as increasing the size of the photosites themselves. While still relatively low for its class, the 400D's measured and visible image noise was significantly worse than that of the CCD-based Nikon D80 for any given ISO speed.
In general, the 400D's measured also speed fell short of the D80's. Our experience bears that out -- though it felt as if it were fast and responsive, we frequently found the shot was captured just a fraction of a second too late. Keep in mind that it takes a while to adjust to the pace of a camera and to get a feel for its shooting rhythm -- and we've been shooting with faster pro models such as the Canon EOS 30D and Olympus E-1 -- and it's fast enough so that, in time, the number of missed shots would have dropped.
Continuous-shooting performance has been tweaked a bit. Though the speed remains the same as in the 350D, Canon rates the 400D to shoot as many as 27 frames of JPEG or 10 frames of raw before the camera hits a bottleneck and slows. It fared slightly better in our testing, though the 7-second lag before you can continue shooting can be frustrating. The 400D uses Canon's Digic II chipset rather than the newer Digic III, and we wonder if the company might have been able to eke out better performance and noise suppression with the latter.
 |
Raw shot-to-shot time |
|
Time to first shot |
|
Shutter lag (dim light) |
|
Shutter lag (typical) |
We did most of our testing with the kit lens. We love how small and lightweight it is, but still find it too slow -- the maximum aperture of f/3.5 simply doesn't let in enough light and doesn't allow for a shallow enough depth of field for our purposes. Furthermore, there's far more chromatic aberration -- in this case, purple fringing -- than we're used to seeing in a dSLR. Even catchlights in eyes from the add-on flash had fringing. If you have the money, we'd recommend the EF-S 17mm-to-55mm f/2.8 IS USM instead. We didn't get a chance to try it with the 400D, but it should be lightweight enough not to overpower the body and fast enough to provide more exposure latitude. It also has the advantage of optical image stabilisation and a quieter motor.
Image quality
Despite our few complaints, the Canon EOS 400D still shoots some nice photos, with good colour rendition, broad dynamic range (when there's sufficient illumination) and accurate automatic white balance. Shots taken at ISO 100 and ISO 200 were very clean, but beyond that, the photos couldn't take much retouching without drawing attention to the noise.
Canon is not planning to do away with the 350D, and the presence of a new model doesn't make that great model obsolete. If you don't change lenses that often, don't mind the smaller LCD, don't need the slight bump in continuous-shooting speed and don't need the higher resolution, then you don't really need to pay extra for the Canon EOS 400D. Furthermore, if you don't yet have an investment in any particular manufacturer's lens system and want this year's best model for less than £800, you might consider the Nikon D80.
Additional editing by Elizabeth Griffin
Visit reviews.cnet.co.uk for in-depth reviews of many more products
